A Fascist Government?
Umerto Eco wrote this essy on Fascism.
- I hate the way that Fascism is thrown about on social media.
- BUT
- Think about this government and see how many of his 14 points can be ticked.
- Certainly number 1, a fixation with tradition.
- 2, well, maybe.
- 3, Action for actions sake. Operation Save Big Dog is a prime example.
- 4, Liz Truss said that she was a patriot introducing a bill that breaks international law. The obvious inference is that you are not a patriot if you disagree with her.
- 5, Fear of difference. This seems to me obvious. Ukrainian refuges from conflict are good, Syrians fleeing conflict are bad.
- 6, Appealing to frustrated middle classes? Just look at The Daily Mail.
- 7, feeling that there are plots against them? Oh yes. Both within the party and from outside. Johnson is doubling down.
- 8, “By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.” That is so obvious within the government at the moment. The unions have no power and repressent no one. As well as being athreat to the nation.
- 9, “Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy” I do not want to be killed in a nuclear war, so wanting to reduce the weapons of mass destruction is unpatrionic (see point 4).
- 10, Contempt for the weak. “We put a caring arm around the vulnerable in homes, but not during the pandemic.
- 11, OK not sure about his one. Give me time and I will come up with answers.
- 12, “Machismo implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.” So completely untrue of this country, they embrace difference, unless you are a woman, gay or have a different life style. God help you if you are a gay traveller. NIMBY is this governments, and their supporters’ watch word.
- 13, “There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.” We are there.
- 14, “All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning.” Sounds like dumbing down to me, and discouraging the study of English lit in universities. Placing more value in learning “practical” skills over learning “soft” skills like thinking.
- Rant over, for now.
Boris Johnson, an Apology?
Is it a REAL Apology from Boris Johnson?
Is Johnson’s apology real? No, of course not. Here is the text;
I want to apologise. I know that millions of people across this country have made extraordinary sacrifices over the last 18 months. “I know the anguish they have been through – unable to mourn their relatives, unable to live their lives as they want or to do the things they love.
“I know the rage they feel with me and with the government I lead when they think in Downing Street itself the rules are not being properly followed by the people who make the rules. And though I cannot anticipate the conclusions of the current inquiry, I have learned enough to know there were things we simply did not get right and I must take responsibility.
“No 10 is a big department with a garden as an extension of the office which has been in constant use because of the role of fresh air in stopping the virus.
“When I went into that garden just after six on May 20 2020, to thank groups of staff before going back into my office 25 minutes later to continue working, I believed implicitly that this was a work event.
“With hindsight I should have sent everyone back inside. I should have found some other way to thank them.
“I should have recognised that even if it could be said technically to fall within the guidance, there are millions and millions of people who simply would not see it that way, people who have suffered terribly, people who were forbidden from meeting loved ones at all inside or outside, and to them and to this house I offer my heartfelt apologies.
What it Means
How can he say that he has now “learned enough to know there were things we simply did not get right” ? He denied any knowledge of parties. Then the photos were leaked. He denied that he knew anything about quiz nights. Then the photos were leaked. Nothing happened on 20th May. Then the truth was leaked and suddenly he remembered the day.
He knew, he always knew but always denied and squirmed.
He is not apologising for anything more than an oversight. He did not recognise a party when he was there for 25 minutes. He thought that wine, and cheese went along with work meetings.
He is not apologising for lying. He is not apologising for appalling judgment. He is not appologising for knowingly expecting the rest of us to do what he thought did not apply to him.
Then he went on to say;
“I know the rage they feel with me and with the government I lead when they think in Downing Street itself the rules are not being properly followed by the people who make the rules. ”
When they think? When They Think?
He does not know the extent and depth of the rage and anger. He has no idea.
Boris Johnson, An Apology Scorned?
Some of his MPs have had enough. William Wragg, a senior MP, has said that he should go. However, he has never been afan of Johnson’s. Looks like the Scottish Conservative party is ditching him, but then, Johnson was always a liabiliy for them at the poles. What will really tip the balance against him is if the Tory MPs begin to feal that he may cost them therir seats. To trigger a confidence vote just over 50 Tory MPs have to write a letter requesting a vote.
It was interesting to see members of the cabinet supporting Johnson today. Most of them that is. Sunak had urgent business in Devon and could not get tothe Commons for PMQs. Johnson should not complain. He once dodged a vote about Heathrow by flying off to Afghanistan. (Remember him saying that he would lie down in front the bulldozers when they started work on the third runway?)
For now he looks safe. At least until Sue Gray’s report is published. I imagine that any eport that does not directly blame Johnson by name will be presented as vindication by Johnson. He may well survive. The thing that he does not seem to understand is that he has passed the Clegg Point. The Clegg Point is that tipping point when a politician can not regain the public’s trust. For Clegg it was student loans for Johnson it was 20th May 2020.
Links;
Senior MP joins Scottish MSPs in calling for Johnson to resign (Guardian)
Johnson mocked online (Mail Online)
Boris Johnson faces calls to resign after he admits attending ‘bring your own booze’ event (Financial Times)
I Agree with the Sun (blog about MP Expenses)
Another Day, Another U-Turn
Tory Sleaze, Again
Or, Another misjudgement by Boris (Blunder) Johnson
It seems that the sleaze fest that is the Tories rumbles on with misjudgement adding to their woes. People objected when the Tories tried to let off one of their own who was found guilty of an “egregious” breach of lobbying rules. What a surprise. It would seem that some people (everyone apart from Boris (Blunder) Johnson) thinks that having a jury consisting of Blunder’s friends, presided over by one of Blunder’s friends, ruling on Blunder’s friends is not a good idea.
Who’d have thought? That one came out of the blue didn’t it?
Jacob Rees-Mogg Announces a “Re-think”
For “Re-think” read, climb down. If you are going to be corrupt and mired in sleaze the least that you owe your corrupt pals is that you do it well. Blunder Johnson just can not get anything right. He has no ability to think things through. If he had he would not have bought water cannons that could not be used. Would not have wasted millions on a garden bridge etc. etc. If he had any integrity he would not have avoided the vote on the third Heathrow runway by running away to Afghanistan.
Tory Sleaze
There is something reassuring that Blunder Johnson is so bad at being corrupt and incompetent. He will be found out. The trouble is that he has a large majority. It would take a number of Tory MPs of integrity to face him down. However tghere are not a number of such Tory MPs and they are cowed into silence.
God help us all.
Tory Sleaze, Tories Vote to Rip Up Ethics Committee
Tory Sleaze is back, Did it ever go Away?
This was, if my memory serves, a list put together by the Tory whips so that their members could be “pursuaded” to vote the right way. Some interesting names on the list. Foreign secretaries (past and present), Transport Minister, Ex Home Secetary, etc. etc. The great and the good of the Tory party, well the great, well, the pompous and dodgy.
That was Tory Sleaze in 2017, This is Tory Sleaze in 2021
Owen Paterson, broke lobbying rules, not once, but 14 times. Yet, he has been saved by his Tory mates. They have voted to abolish the rules! You could not make it up, or perhaps you could. Rotten to the core. Did we really expect anything else from Johnson’s party? (Owen means “noble”, noble by name but not by nature)
Common decency would suggest that Paterson should have been cut loose, if for no other reason that this comes hard on the heals of Cameron’s exposure of his greed, but no, the Tories have circled the wagons to protect one of their own.
Israeli Minister Denied Access to COP 26
COP 26
Johnson’s mob makes me ashamed. Just when you think that they could not get worse.
“Karine Elharrar, Israel’s minister for energy and water, was forced to wait two hours outside the event site Monday after organizers refused to let her enter in her adapted vehicle, she said.
Her office said she was later offered shuttle transport to the summit area, but the bus was not wheelchair-accessible and she had to return to her hotel in Edinburgh.” (source)
Johnson Falls Flat
The first day of COP 26 did not start well. It was late starting, then Johnson made his opening speech. The jokes fell flat and he exposed the difference between his rhetoric and his government’s actions. He appealed for action to protect and save the world. This a week after his Chancellor slashed internal flight taxes. His government continues to pursue oil extraction and wants to open a new coal mine.
Scottish Greens climate spokesperson Mark Ruskell MSP said:
“We all know the Prime Minister’s actions seldom match his rhetoric but when it comes to climate crisis Johnson is taking duplicity to new levels.” (Which you must admit is an achievement, given his record of lying and obscurification).
This is a man who will not even admit to how many children he has. (His father claims to have at least one more grand children than Johnson admits he has kids). His record of incompetence is amazing. Remember the water cannon that could not be used in London, it would have been illegal. They were eventually sold for scrap, at a loss of £300,000. How about the garden bridge? Failed, failed, failed. At least it only cost the taxpayers £43m (only). The list goes on. Not firing Dominic Cummings (irresponsible), Patel (incompetent bully), Hancock (incompetent – too stupid to realise he was on CCTV, JenricK (breaking covids rules) and all the others.
And yet this is the man in “charge” of COP 26.
God help us all.
My First YouTube Video!
I have just published my first YouTube video. It is intended as an aide for meditation. It should be said that I have no idea what I was doing. I hope that you enjoy it.
New Video Channel
I have also started a new YouTube channel to house this and future videos. It is called “Wellbeing, Being well”. As I get older I am beginning to realise that I should pay more attention to my well being and mental health. In the past I have struggled with depression and self destructive thoughts. My aim with this channel is to provide ideas and information addressing all aspects of “Wellbeing” (Dreadful word). That includes meditation, diet, exercise, mindfulness.
I want to steer away from the more esoteric ideas and practices that you see on YouTube in the general area of wellbeing. It is not that I think that reiki, or say, acupuncture are not worthwhile, more that I do not have direct experience of them. I expect that the scope of “Wellbeing, Be Well” will increase as time passes.
One area that I am keen to address is diet and exercise. I love cooking and regard exercise (other than walking) with great suspicion. It may well be that as I change my diet (learn not to add wine and cream as I cook dishes) The channel will reflect a simpler way of cooking. Over the last year or two my diet has changed to reduce the amount of meat and increase the amount of pulses. I would expect that move away from meat to continue.
As to exercise. I can not understand why people go to gyms. It could be fair to say that my body self image issues overcome any desire to don the lycra. I am, however, aware of the benefits of exercise. My YouTube channel is likely to reflect the benefits of non gym based exercise. There is something that appeals to me in the image of using bags of sugar as weights or using everyday items in exercise routines. We will see.
In the meantime I hope that you enjoy “Wellbeing, Being well” If you have any suggestions please let me know.
Gavin Williamson is Missing
Where is he? Has anyone seen Gavin Williamson?
If you have forgotten (as he seems to have) he is the minister for education and he has been having a hard time recently.
First “A refusal to make contingency plans was the “most unforgivable” element of the UK government’s handling of education during the pandemic, according to a damning report detailing widespread failures. In the findings, based on interviews with senior officials, the Institute for Government, a think-tank, on Wednesday laid out what happened behind the scenes in a year of policy twists and turns as schools struggled to keep up with conflicting advice from ministers.The account paints an unflattering picture of both the Department for Education and Downing Street, suggesting both were opposed to local authorities and fixated on centralisation.” (Source The Financial Times)
Then there is the scandal of the confusion when this year’s GCSE and A-level exams were dropped in January after the government had insisted for months they would go ahead.
Then there is the huge, and growing, discrepancy between the results obtained by the independent schools, and the results of the schools the rest us use. (Hardly surprising that he doesn’t care about this when Good Ol’ Gav had to be shamed into even feeding poor kids.) You would have thought that e would come out hitting, defending his department but he has been strangely quiet, hidden from the press and public. Can’t say that I blame him, perhaps he has a sense of shame after all.
Gavin Williamson, the Sly Schemer
For someone who seems so affable and reliable Gavin (or Good Ol’ Gav, as no one calls him) has attracted some oddly negative comments from those on his own side, let alone The Opposition, parents, or anyone who knows him in fact. Take Alan Duncan’s wonderfully indelicate diaries (Amazon link). Duncan has a few choice words to say about Gavin, the diaries are contemporanious so they show how prescient Duncan is. In November 2017 Gavin was promoted to Secretary of State for Defence, and Duncan wrote;
“In quite the most extraordinary cabinet appointment I can think of, Gavin Williamson has been promoted Defence Secretary. It is absolutely absurd. He seems to have pushed himself forward for this undeserved promotion. It is a brazenly self-serving manoeuvre that will further embed the view of him as a sly schemer, which he undoubtedly is,”
“He is also ludicrously unqualified for the heavyweight job of defence secretary, having never run anything. His experience amounts to having been a fireplace salesman, then bag-carrier for two PMs, then chief whip for a year. What on earth was the PM thinking?”
Gavin Williamson, a venomous, self-seeking little shit
Duncan reports that Gavin Williamson is suspected of leaking against Cabinet colleagues and so is “universally detested” by those on his own benches. He accuses Williamson of scheming against former Defence Secretary Amber Rudd. He also accused him of working against the then Prime MInister. His comment is that Gavin Williamson is a “venomous, self-seeking little shit”. Don’t you just hate it when people sit on the fence.
Gavin Williamson, Here Today, Gone Tomorrow?
There is, it would seem, a good chance that Williamson will be thrown to the wolves at the next reshuffle, as reported in The Guardian. The one question I have is whether that will ever happen. Remember, he used to be chief whip and knows where the bodies are buried. He also, apparently, a history of coniving against his rivals and friends (although there are few of them). He has a list of all the scandals, the rumours, the schemes and the lies.
Can you see him going quietly? Neither can I. If he does go what price will he demand, and get from Johnson?
Covid – 19. UK Government’s Mistakes and Lies. (part 1)
Covid – 19 (Coronavirus) is on the Rise, Why?
Imperial College London published a major report today (29th October). It says that the pace of the covid – 19 epidemic is accelerating. The report estimates that the number of people infected is increasing by 100,000 a day. That figure is doubling every nine days. (You can read the full report here)
The Government says that it has “followed the science”, that is has “put an arm round the care sector”, “provided all the PPE that is necessary”. If the government has done all it can and acted in a timely fashion why are we in this mess?
Hindsight is a Wonderful Thing.
I am always sceptical of those who use hindsite to justify their prejudices and have attempted to avoid hindsight wisdom here. My appologies if I failed, occassionally. You should also be aware that I have written about covid – 19 before and do not claim to be impartial when looking at the this government’s response. (Previous blogs are Here and Here)
Covid – 19, Back to the Start
The first confirmed fatality from covid – 19 outside China was on 2nd February. There is a feeling that Andy Gill (memebr of The Gang of Four) who died on the 1st of February may have died of Covid – 19 in St Thomas’s hospital in London.
Even before that the first confirmed cases of coronavirus in the UK came on 31 January when two Chinese nationals staying in a hotel in York tested positive.
3 February
There is a modelling group called SPI-M (The Scientific Influenza Pandemic Group on Mocdelling). It produced a report that reviewed the infection in China. One of the comments was that it was “unclear whether outbreaks can be contained by isolation and contact tracing. If a high proportion of asymptomatic cases are infectious, then containment is unlikely via these policies.”
Even on 3rd February it was clear that track and trace would not work on its own to contain and control the infection when it reached this country.
27 February
Chris Whitty (Chief Medical Officer) tells the media that mass gatherings such as sports events and concerts may have to be cancelled. That schools closed for more than two months, if the UK is hit badly by coronavirus.
Two days later, Health Minister Edward Argar told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that “decisions on large events and whether they should go ahead will be taken at the time on the basis of the evidence.”
I should point out that, at this point, the SPI-M advice was that closing mass events could drive people into pubs to watch football, for example, and this could be more dangerous that letting events go ahead. I have a problem with this advice. Not many games are televised live, apart from the elite clubs. So cancelling non Premier League club games would not drive hoards of people into the pubs to the watch the games. It seems to me that this advice and the whole approach from Sage and through the government was not, and is not, rooted in the real world.
3 March
The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) issued this advice; “There was agreement that Government should advise against greetings such as shaking hands and hugging, given existing evidence about the importance of hand hygiene.”
The Sage sub-group, the Independent Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviours (SPI-B), said. “A public message against shaking hands has additional value as a signal about the importance of hand hygiene.”
On the very same day Boris Johnson held a press conference broadcast on national television. He said “I was at a hospital the other night where I think there were a few coronavirus patients and I shook hands with everybody, you will be pleased to know, and I continue to shake hands.”
Prick.
The “contain” phase of the government’s response to covid – 19 is launched. The idea is to “detect early cases, follow up close contacts, and prevent the disease taking hold in this country for as long as is reasonably possible”.
I wonder how that went. I will cover the next part of the story shortly.
Coronavirus – What The World Thinks of Us
Coronavirus UK – 31,587 deaths, and counting. How on Earth did it Come to This?
With a world coronavirus pandemic (meaning; an infection or disease prevalent over a whole country or the world) you would think that it takes a special lack of talent to be the worst in Europe and second worst in the the whole world. However, the UK government insists that it is working “night and day” “24 hours a day” (and any other meaningless phrase that they can conjure up) to defeat this common enemy. So why are the outcomes in this country so bad?
The View from Abroad
Perhaps we can get a handle on this question by looking at the foreign press. (Yes, I know, we do not usually look at the foreign press – after all, we are British, we can overcome anything by a liberal application of a stiff upper lip. We do not care what foreigners think).
I am nonplussed that the British media seem to be so supine. Am I the only person who questions Johnson’s response? Am I being unfair both to the government (entirely possible as I never vote Tory) and the media (possible as I harbour a right wing bias theory about the national papers).
So, let’s look at some foreign papers. At the outset I want to say that I did not select the papers, they were the first results of a Google search. In other words, these results are not the result of a self serving selection. They are the first results of my search.
The USA – CNN
Their Headline – Where did it go wrong for the UK on coronavirus?
OK, so the stance of CNN is pretty obvious from the headline, even if you think that it is pretty rich coming from the USA (Coronavirus deaths 80,040). So what did they say? (Follow this link for the full story)
A couple of quotes (I urge youn to read the full article to make sure that I am not slanting the tone of this entry);
“And, despite ministers’ repeated insistence that they are being “guided by the science” in their coronavirus response, secrecy still shrouds the nature of that scientific advice. The current membership of the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (SAGE), the government’s main scientific advisory body, which changes depending on the crisis, has not been listed publicly. The group hasn’t published the basis of any of its advice for more than a month. There is, as yet, no published framework for exiting the lockdown that has brought the fifth largest economy in the world to a grinding halt. “
And another;
” Indeed, the next day (March 13th) , Vallance (Chief Scientific Advisor) told BBC Radio 4’s flagship morning news program, in a now-infamous interview, that a “key” aim would be to “build up some kind of herd immunity so more people are immune to this disease and we reduce the transmission.” Government sources have told CNN that herd immunity was never official policy.”
CNN claims that the concept of herd immunity was abandoned by the UK government when modelling showed that it would lead to 250,000 deaths. It does pose 3 questions about the UK government’s performance that n eed to be answered;
1. The abandonment of mass tesing.
“Abandoning testing gave the virus the green light to spread uncontrollably,” says the Royal Society of Medicine’s Gabriel Scally. “If you don’t have access to testing, you won’t know that you have an outbreak until a lot of people are ill.” (Ill and dying – my comment not CNN’s)
2. Whether the government failed to order a lockdown early enough.
March 12th ” On that day Johnson stood before journalists, flanked by his scientific and medical advisers, and admitted that “many more families are going to lose loved ones.” But he didn’t go as far as ordering a lockdown — that would come over a week later. “
3. The third big question is the pursuit of so-called “herd immunity.”
If it was such a good idea why does no one else in the world agree? If it was such a good idea why talk about it in March and then deny that you did 10 days later? Does herd immunity even work with a virus that mutates?
The USA – New York Times
Their Headline – U.K. Paid $20 Million for New Coronavirus Tests. They Didn’t Work.
Read the full story here.
Basically, this is the story of incompetence. Someone sidles up to you in a pub and says,”do you want some antibody tests, no questions asked?” You are desperate for good news and so you say “Yes” and give them a huge wad of notes. The tests arrive, but they do not work. Ooops. Sit coms have been written with similar plots.
It beggars belief, it really does.
Italy – The Corriere della Sera
Italy (Coronavirus deaths 30,395 )
Here is the translation;
“The country that was the most reluctant in Europe to introduce the closures has become the most cautious in starting the reopening: thanks to the fear that grips the government and public opinion. The data are also worrying: the United Kingdom is now the European country with the highest number of coronavirus deaths, with more than 32,000 registered victims, according to the Independent. The lockdown review is expected on Thursday, and it is obvious that it will be extended for another three weeks. That was also to be the date on which Boris Johnson would present at least one “road map” for phase 2: but the prime minister gave himself until Sunday evening when he will announce his plan in a televised speech to the nation. But what filters through the newspapers does not seem encouraging at all.”
It seems odd reading a piece from Italy that sounds so hopeless, about the UK. No trumpeting that the title of “sickman of Europe” has been taken from Italy, just a sad shrug of the shoulders. Says it all.
Australia – The Sydney Morning Herald
Their Headline – ‘Biggest failure in a generation’: Where did Britain go wrong?From the respected Australian
This respected Australian paper does not mince its words. (Oh yes, Austalia – Coronavirus deaths 97)
” Unlike Italy, the United Kingdom had time to prepare for the coronavirus tsunami. But as the death toll climbs, critics say Britain’s response has suffered from a series of deadly mistakes and miscalculations.”
“Health Secretary Matt Hancock was midway through a radio interview when the phone call came through live to air. On the line was Intisar Chowdhury, whose father Abdul had made a prescient public plea to Boris Johnson in late March.
Through a Facebook post, the 53-year-old consultant urologist for a London hospital had urged the Prime Minister to make sure every health worker in Britain would be given protective equipment during the coronavirus pandemic. Abdul Mabud Chowdhury died just three weeks later, after contracting the disease.”
Obviously, Intisar did not get a proper answer or a real apology. Remember Hancock blames the nurses for using too much PPE.
Canada – CBC web site
Their headline – U.K. COVID-19 death toll surpasses 32,000, making it deadliest coronavirus outbreak in Europe
Canada (Coronavirus deaths – 4,693 )
“British media reported Tuesday that more than 32,000 Britons have now died from the virus, about a third of them believed to be in long-term care homes.
That number, which is based on data from the Office for National Statistics, the National Records of Scotland and the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency and exceeds the official Department of Health toll of 28,734, far surpasses what government scientists called their “best case scenario” of 20,000 COVID-19 deaths.
With Britain now having overtaken Italy, where around 29,000 people have died of COVID-19, as the country with the deadliest outbreak in Europe, Johnson’s government is facing intense scrutiny over its actions in the early days of the pandemic.
“It just wasn’t acted upon and taken as a serious enough threat,” said Devi Sridhar, chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh.”
Coronavirus – Conclusion
Too interested in Brexit, too late to recognise the seriousness of the problem, too disinterested in the fate of the people that voted for them. A damning critique of our government from around the world. Are they all wrong?
Coronavirus – It’s the Nurses Fault!
Hancock Continues to Demonstrate His Incompetence
Another day another coronavirus briefing in which Hancock showed just how bad he is at his job. You would have thought that the Health Secretary would want to help and support the NHS. However, when he was presented with his own organisational failings he blamed the nurses. They use too much PPE.
Dangerous Strategy
Even if front line NHS staff were misusing coronavirus PPE blaming the country’s angels for his failings is a dangerous strategy. The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) is not amused. In a pointed statement of advice for its members it said that “Ultimately, if you have exhausted all other measures to reduce the risk and you have not been given appropriate PPE in line with the UK Infection Prevention and Control guidance, you are entitled to refuse to work. This will be a last resort and the RCN recognises what a difficult step this would be for nursing staff.” The RCN also said that it would help any nurses taking such action defend any court action.
Coronavirus PPE – Je Ne Regrette Rien
Handed the pefect oppotunity to apologise and admit that the situation could have been handled better in today’s coronavirus briefing Hancock ducked and refused to answer the question. He did not even follow Priti Patel’s style of non apology, she said “sorry if people feel there have been failings” . This non apology was echoed by Alok Sharma the business secretary on the Andrew Marr Show saying “I’m incredibly sorry that people feel they are not able to get this equipment.” At least he had the good grace to also say that there was “clearly a need for more protective equipment”. Seen, by some as a rebuke for Hancock’s performance. The more striking as it came from a junior minister.
Avoidance, Not Answers
Hancock has the look of a haunted and hunted man. He clearly does not enjoy the coronavirus briefings. He avoids questions, tries to misdirect by answering the questions he wishes were asked. To be fair all politicians do this, it is one of their little tricks. The problem for Hancock is that he is not very good at it. I said “the problem” truth is he has a few problems.
With Friends Like These….
Last week Times and its sister paper The Sunday Times said that the cabinet, civil servants, and special advisors were positioning themselves so that they will avoid the inevitable blame when this crisis is over. (Perhaps that is why Patel seems to have been dragged screaming and crying into her first coronavirus briefing). This week The Sunday Times has a piece that denies that there is a rift between Rishi Sunak and Hancock. The interesting question is why they had to deny the rumour, unless there is some prima facia reason to believe it.
Last week The Sunday Times reported that Hancock’s minesterial colleagues were refering to him as “Handjob”. Referring to someone as an act of masturbation does not imply any respect at all. Perhaps he is not paranoid perhaps his friends are out to get him.
Links
Sky News – RCN advice to nurses
Independent – Hancock refuses to apologise
The Guardian – Patel’s non apology